<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Metrology on Craig Andera</title>
    <link>https://www.craigandera.org/tags/metrology/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Metrology on Craig Andera</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:25:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.craigandera.org/tags/metrology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss&#43;xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Squaring Squares</title>
      <link>https://www.craigandera.org/projects/squaring-squares/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 &#43;0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.craigandera.org/projects/squaring-squares/</guid>
      <description>Grinding steel squares true on my surface grinder.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
A friend of mine had some woodworking squares that, well, weren&#39;t. He sent them to me, and sure enough, they were way, way out of square. Woodworking tools don&#39;t need to be as accurate as machining tools, but I had just gotten the surface grinder, so I thought I would see how far I could take it.</p>
<p>
The outside metal edge was easy enough. I just clamped the inside reference face to a 2-4-6 block and ran the grinder along the edge. I clamped a 1-2-3 block to the blade for some additional stability.</p>
<p>
<img src="https://www.craigandera.org/projects/squaring-squares/photo.jpg" alt="./photo.jpg" title="./photo.jpg" /></p>
<p>
I have to admit I was a bit curious about just how square those 2-4-6 blocks were, since they weren&#39;t particularly expensive. So out came the surface plate, the cylinder square, and the tenths indicator.</p>
<p>
<img src="https://www.craigandera.org/projects/squaring-squares/measuring square.jpg" alt="./measuring square.jpg" title="./measuring square.jpg" />
I wasn&#39;t particularly surprised to discover that the blocks were out by a fair amount - around 0.002&#34; if I remember correctly. Not great by machining standards, but I decided to ignore it for this project.</p>
<p>
The inside edge of the square was harder. The surface grinder doesn&#39;t have enough clearance to reach past the blade when it is flipped around, and I don&#39;t have a cup wheel for it. I decided to run it on the mill instead.</p>
<p>
Here&#39;s what that looks like in action, with the cup wheel taking light passes along the edge:</p>
<p>
<div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden;">
			<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share; fullscreen" loading="eager" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/rwd0aHRyMc8?autoplay=0&amp;controls=1&amp;end=0&amp;loop=0&amp;mute=0&amp;start=0" style="position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; border:0;" title="YouTube video"></iframe>
		</div>
</p>
<p>
It&#39;s not awesome to run abrasive stuff on the mill, since the grit can get into the ways and speed up wear. I covered the ways as best I could, but hopefully this isn&#39;t something I&#39;ll do very often. I should just get a cup wheel for the surface grinder.</p>
<p>
The squares have already gone back to my friend, and he reports them as &#34;more than accurate enough for anything I&#39;ll ever use them for&#34;. Nice. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
